Showing posts with label metals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label metals. Show all posts

Monday, June 29, 2009

[Commodities] -- Is the rally over?

Commodity Rally May Falter on Supply, Speculators

June 29 (Bloomberg) -- Commodities, heading for the first quarterly advance in a year, may struggle to repeat their gains in the next three months as supply expands and speculators sell.

Nickel may average 29 percent less in the third quarter than now, crude oil 16 percent, copper 14 percent and gasoline 10 percent, analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg show. Hedge funds and speculators cut their bets on higher prices by 23 percent in the two weeks ended June 23, the first back-to-back drop since March, based on an index using U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission data. The World Bank said June 22 the global recession will be deeper than it expected three months ago.

“Commodities have gotten a little ahead of themselves,” said Walter “Bucky” Hellwig, who helps oversee $30 billion at Morgan Asset Management in Birmingham, Alabama. “As long as there’s uncertainty about growth, that’s going to be headwind commodities won’t be able to overcome.”

Commodities rose 14 percent this quarter, led by nickel, oil and sugar, after three consecutive declines, according to the Reuters/Jefferies CRB Index of 19 raw materials. This year’s 57 percent advance in oil costs, combined with widening budget deficits, may cause another global slump, said Nouriel Roubini, the New York University economics professor who predicted the financial crisis.

Click here to access the full article from Bloomberg


Share/Save/Bookmark

Thursday, June 4, 2009

Peru ETF to start trading this month reports Bloomberg


Are you a international investor with a global perspective? Are you looking to get in on all the action down in Latin America? Well now is the time to consider jumping on board the "Peruvian growth miracle?"

Before you do however, I implore you to proceed with caution if you decide to park your hard earned currency in Peru. As always, it would be a good idea to do your own due diligence and listen to what your textbook, academic gut feeling has told you about Latin America since you started reading about continent in economic and finance classes you took in college.

Peru's Lima General Index has sky rocketed a whoppin' 95% this year due to the following reasons in particular (in my opinion)

a) The country's investment grade debt rating

b) Rising metals prices; copper, gold, silver, etc (note I did not include Zinc here)

c) Optimism in Peru's metropolitan middle and upper-middle class residents of Lima who partially feed the international excitement by telling stories of economic boom. Ask a university student of la Universidad de Lima, UPC, Universidad Pacifico or a employee at Banco Santander and they will probably (some of them at least) tell you of rising apartment buildings, new beach houses and cafes so full of customers you must wait to get a table. Yes, it is still difficult to find a job that pays well, but if you know anything about Peru this has been the case since the beginning of time...

d) Shrinking investment opportunities in the region because of western fears and dislike of Chavez in Venezuela, Correa in Ecuador, Morales in Bolivia and more recently Cristina Fernández de Kirchner in Argentina.

e) LIES... LIES... oh and yes, more LIES. Farid Matuk the previous head of INEI (Peru's statistics office) and Otto from IncaKolaNews have been telling readers for months that you simply can not trust economic data from Peru. Alan Garcia has replaced the people working at the statistics office with those loyal to his political party and they have inherently changed the way statistics are collected and the way GDP and other economic indicators are calculated.

Here are some links to Farid Matuk and Otto's recent observations of Peru's economic picture. I will stick to English, but I highly recommend if you can read Spanish that you check out some of Matuk's non-English posts.

Doubts grow about accuracy of Peru GDP numbers -- Reuters Terry Wade

Peru's Economic Model and Poverty Reduction: Is it Working -- Farid Matuk

Farid Matuk Explains Peru's False GDP Figures -- INK

Now that you know one side, here's the other. GAINS AND LOTS OF THEM.


Peru Lima General Index - 2 yr performance as of 6/4/09

It seems to me the majority of the international financial community have bought into Garcia's lies and have come to believe Peru is a solid place to park your money.

This is despite, as Otto says, demand for base metals just simply does not add up. The Chinese are stockpiling their metals and eventually prices will have to go back down to reality. Check this article.

Despite this reality, investors and what they perceive can go a long way in financial markets. If investors jump on board, this new Peruvian ETF might begin to soar... albeit temporarily until reality sets in.

Benito's conclusion: Invest with caution. I've included the Bloomberg article below, but if you like to access it directly, please click here.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Peru ETF to Start Trading This Month, Global X Says (Update1)

By Veronica Navarro Espinosa

Peru’s first Exchange Traded Fund will start trading on the New York Stock Exchange by the “middle of June,” said the chief executive officer of Global X Management Company LLC, a New York-based asset manager.

“The stock market has risen a lot, investors are bullish, and that’s helping us,” Bruno del Ama, the New York-based CEO of Global X, said in a phone interview. “We’re giving access to the Peruvian market and in the future people can go short in Peru, which is an option that doesn’t exist today.”

Global X and Barclays Plc have been competing to introduce the first Peruvian ETF, aiming to lure global investors to the world’s best performing stock market this year. The funds issue a number of shares and trade throughout the day like stocks. Most are designed to passively track a benchmark equity index.

Peru’s Lima General Index has jumped 95 percent this year on speculation a rebound in prices of the country’s commodity exports will fuel growth amid the global recession. The index’s advance is the biggest among 92 world benchmarks tracked by Bloomberg, reversing a 60 percent plunge in 2008 that was the steepest in Latin America.

“It will create liquidity and that’s what this market lacks,” Carlos Rojas, who manages $160 million in Peruvian stocks and bonds for Compass Peru, said in a phone interview from Lima. “But it’ll all depend on the size. If it attracts less than $150 million, it’ll be a non-event.”

FTSE Peru 20

The new ETF will track the FTSE Peru 20, which will include the nation’s biggest commodity producers such as Maple Energy Plc., an oil and natural gas producer that has gained fourfold this year, the best performer in the index. Del Ama said other members include Austral Group SA, Peru’s biggest fishmeal producer, and Cia. de Minas Buenaventura SA, the largest precious-metals producer.

Resource companies account for 21 of the 36 stocks in the Lima index because Peru is the world’s third-largest producer of copper, zinc and tin, the biggest miner of silver and the fifth- largest of gold.

IShares, a unit of Barclays, is working on introducing its own Peruvian ETF, said Barclays spokeswoman Christine Hudacko in an e-mail today. There’s “no news on timing,” she said.

The iShares MSCI Brazil Index Fund, managed by Barclays, is among the 10 most-traded ETFs in New York, with daily volume of about $1 billion, Barclays Global Investors’ chief executive for Latin America Daniel Gamba said in December. Trading in ETFs in Mexico now accounts for about 20 percent of average daily volume, Gamba said.

[Source] -- Bloomberg


Share/Save/Bookmark

Monday, May 25, 2009

China to launch iron ore trading platform - AP

China will launch its first iron ore trading platform next week in a move that may lead to setting up its own pricing index and possibly exerting more influence over import costs, an official and reports said Friday.


The Rizhao International Iron Ore Trade Center will begin providing electronic commercial services for iron ore suppliers and steelmakers on Monday
, said Liu Qiang, sales manager of Shandong Huaxin Trading Co., which is heading the project.

The center, a joint venture by Shandong Huaxin and four other local companies involved in bulk commodity dealings, will handle electronic transactions, information exchange, quality inspection, storage, transport, insurance and trade settlement, Liu said.

The center will act as a clearinghouse for information on iron ore trading, Liu said.

"As it gains influence in the long-term, it may have some influence on price negotiations," he said.

Rizhao, a port in eastern China's Shandong province, is one of the country's biggest handlers of iron ore imports.

The trading platform would likely mainly serve China's numerous smaller steelmakers. They buy independently from the biggest mills and do not pay the same benchmark prices the big steelmakers agree to each year in sometimes tortuous negotiations with overseas miners like Brazil's Companhia Vale do Rio Doce SA and global miner Rio Tinto Group.

Meanwhile, the annual negotiations with overseas iron ore suppliers dragged on, according to the government-affiliated China Iron & Steel Association, which vehemently denied reports that Chinese steelmakers had settled for 30 percent to 35 percent price cuts.

"China's steel industry and those of Japan and Korea are facing severe shocks from the global financial crisis," CISA said in a statement posted on its Web site. It said the annual negotiations were continuing on a basis of "mutual interest and long-term stability."

Unlike in previous years, when Shanghai-based Baosteel Group led the talks, this year CISA is handling the negotiations. Analysts say it is seeking at least a 40 percent cut in this year's benchmark prices.

China imported 444 million tons of iron ore in 2008 - half of the volume of all imports worldwide, according to government figures. Imports in January through April surged to 188 million tons, as traders took advantage of lower prices to build up stockpiles.


Iron ore pricing has long been a point of contention between China, the world's biggest steel producer and consumer, and foreign raw materials suppliers.

Such friction intensified in recent years as surging demand due to the booming economy and speculative buying drove prices for iron ore and other commodities higher.

But a slowing in industrial production due to the global economic crisis has raised expectations that Chinese and other steelmakers may win big concessions in this round of talks after yielding to demands for double-digit increases in ore prices in previous years.

_

[Source] -- Associated Press researcher Ji Chen contributed to this report.


Share/Save/Bookmark

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Jim Rogers: "We are going to have serious food shortages in a few years"

Jim Rogers sits down with Bloomberg host Haslinda Amin in his home base of Singapore. Haslinda gets a full twenty minutes to test his patience while she asks what his opinions are on investing in a variety of investment categories. Commodities. Currencies. North American Natural Gas. Yen Carry Trade. Agriculture. Equities. ETF's.

As usual, Jim Rogers is sticking to what he knows best-raw materials. If you're a new reader, or have not heard of Jim Rogers definitely run a search on the right of his name to bring up past posts and videos including him.


Part 1 /3




Part 2 / 3




Part 3 / 3




Share/Save/Bookmark

Thursday, May 7, 2009

Newswire: Latin America - Region



[Venezuela] -- Oil-Services Law to Affect Some Foreign Companies
New nationalization legislation now in the hands of Venezuelan lawmakers will impact the operations of some oil-services companies but will leave out rig firms and large well-service firms.

Oil Minister Rafael Ramirez noted Wednesday that firms such as Williams Co. (WMB), a U.S. firm that operates a high-pressure gas compression facility in Venezuela, could be affected by the new law, but noted that oil rig firms and large service firms such as Schlumberger Ltd. (SLB) and Halliburton Co. (HAL) are not included.


[Bolivia] -- U.N. Team Documents Forced Labor Among Indians in Bolivia
LA PAZ – A mission dispatched by the U.N. Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues reported Tuesday that it had verified the existence of Indian communities in eastern Bolivia that are being subjected to forced labor.


[Peru] -- Central Bank May Cut Interest Rate to 4% as Domestic Demand Stalls
Peru’s central bank will probably cut its benchmark lending rate for a fourth straight month today as slowing inflation allows policy makers to lower borrowing costs and bolster flagging domestic demand.


[Peru] -- Repsol to Invest $500 Million a Year in Peru, Complete Projects
Repsol YPF chairman and CEO Antonio Brufau said Tuesday that the Spanish energy giant would invest $500 million per year in Peru, completing $6 billion in oil and natural gas projects.

The Spanish oil company has a large stake in the development of the Camisea natural gas field in southeastern Peru and plans to begin exporting fuel to Mexico next year.


[Chile] -- Codelco Increases Reserves by 20 Percent
Chile’s state-owned National Copper Corporation, or Codelco, the world’s largest producer of the red metal, increased its proven and probable reserves by 20 percent in 2008, company sources told Efe on Wednesday.


[Mexico] --
Calderon Deploys Reserves as Swine Flu Depletes Mexico Financial Resources
As the sun sets on Ciudad Juarez, the Mexican border city’s citizens flee to the safety of their homes. The vendors who crowd Avenida Juarez to sell tacos and ice cream during the day pack up their carts and disappear. Hawkers who hand out leaflets for a local mall are gone too -- and the mall itself is a ghost town.

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

China's Minmetals makes a new offer for Australian miner OZ Minerals -- Reuters Video






Mar 31 - China's state-owned Minmetals made new offer for Australian miner OZ Minerals, as the world's No.3 economy continues its push for resource acquisitions.

China makes a new offer for Australian miner OZ Minerals excludes Prominent Hill while OZ hopes to seal debt extension by early Wednesday.

Kitty Bu of Reuters reports

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Jim Rogers comments on China - Tuesday, March 24

Monday, March 9, 2009

Peru-China to Sign FTA Agreement on April 15th

China and Peru will be officially sign their Free Trade Agreement on April 15th, according to this El Comericio article, a Lima based newspaper.

Li Chang Chun Alan Garcia

Jose Garcia Balaunde, Peruvian Minister of Exterior Relations announced the agreement would be signed in the "capital of the Asian giant," his words not mine...

Negociations had been under way for quite some time, concluding on November 19, 2008 during the APEC summit which Peru hosted.

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

CIC to invest in commodities

China Investment Corp is looking for investment opportunities in commodities, according to Jesse Wang, a senior official with China's $200 billion plus sovereign wealth fund.

Officials have said that CIC wants to diversify its portfolio in the natural resources sector after booking heavy losses on high-profile financial investments in private equity fund Blackstone and U.S. bank Morgan Stanley.

Wang, CIC chief risk officer, said the global recession had just begun, and as a result, bigger price declines in commodities and energy were possible.

"No matter where the company invests, it is always possible there will be book losses in a particular period," he told reporters on the sidelines of a meeting of a parliamentary advisory body.

The wealth fund will diversify its investments in the financial and energy sectors, Wang added.

A move into commodities and energy by CIC would add to a wave of investments backed by Chinese state funds in those sectors that topped $50 billion in February alone, including Russian and Brazilian oil deals and investments in Australian mining firms Rio Tinto and OZ Minerals.

For more articles on this topic click the links below

Foreign interest is all win for Australia
-- The Australian
China's CIC Sees Opportunities in Natural Resources -- CNBC
China Investment Corp may diversify portfolio into commodities, energy -- Reuters via Mineweb
China to invest in undervalues commodity markets -- zionistgoldreport

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Commodities in a Global Recession, Outlook for Grains - Bloomberg

Philip Gotthelf of Equidex -- A new brain in the commodity world I have started to pay attention to.



Analysis and Discussion with President Philip Gotthelf of Equidex (Market Pulse)

Friday, February 20, 2009

"Show me the Mao's!" China goes shopping



Since the inception of this site a major goal has been to inform and sometimes personally analyze China's growing commodity demand and increasing cooperation with emerging markets (particularly South America).


If your interested in the topic Andy Hoffman, of Canada's, Globeandmail wrote a good article today worth your time. Below I've copy and pasted a few paragraphs from the article to summarize it. You can Click here or scroll to the end of this post to access the full article from the Globeandmail.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Flush with cash at a time when most countries and corporations are struggling to gain access capital, the Asian economic superpower has spent nearly $60-billion (U.S.) in less than a week in a series of deals that will secure a long-term supply of iron ore, copper, zinc and oil.

"Cash is king and China has lots of it," said Egizio Bianchini, global head of metals and mining at BMO Nesbitt Burns, which in the past, has represented state-owned Chinese firms in several mining deals.

"China is looking and saying 'We don't have a lot of competition here and we have ready cash.' [For almost everyone else] there is no public debt market and no public equity market," he said.

Desperate for financing amid stalled capital markets and investor abandonment of the sector, resource producers are turning to China for a commodity it has in spades: ready money.

Yesterday, Brazil signed a deal to supply China with 100,000 to 160,000 barrels of oil a day in exchange for billions of dollars of investment. Under the agreement signed in Brasilia, state-owned China Development Bank will provide financing to Brazil's state-run energy company Petrobras to develop its massive oil reserves.


Click here to access the full article from the globeandmail


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Links to recent posts on this topic from
ChinaSouthAmerica: News and Analysis
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

China's metals move a bright spot for sector
-- Feb 13

China-South America -- China pursues Latin America ties -- Feb 9

China-Mexico: Sinopec competes against Schlumberger Ltd and Halliburton Co. for drilling contracts in Mexico - Feb 5

News line: commodities in focus - Feb 2

Emerging Markets' Presence Grows at Davos Economic Forum - Jan 30

China goes shopping for commodities
- Jan 7


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thursday, January 15, 2009

News reel: Economic Meltdown p3 – Commodities

Click on article titles to access the full copy from parents websites


Gold Little Changed in Asia as Dollar Steady Before ECB Meeting – Bloomberg LP - Jan 15, 2009

Jan. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Gold traded little changed in Asia as the dollar steadied before a European Central Bank meeting where interest rates are widely expected to be cut by at least half a percentage point. Platinum declined.


Resources downturn trips up contractors – The Australian – Jan 16, 2009

MINING companies slashing costs and cutting production as they struggle to cope with the global financial crisis is driving down revenue in Australia's engineering, contracting and services sectors.

Although analysts believe that the diminished income and the prospect of further contract cancellations are already being incorporated into share prices, they said the full impact had not yet been incorporated.


Metal meltdown rocks global miner Rio Tinto – The Australian – Jan 16, 2009

RIO Tinto continues to be battered by the global slowdown, with fourth-quarter iron ore sales falling 31 per cent.

Slumping metal prices are set to wipe more than $US500 million ($758 million) from the miner's bottom line and more aluminium production cuts have been flagged.


Under new management, miner ready to tackle debt – The Australian – Jan 16, 2009

RIO Tinto's board has shown it is serious about its turnaround by dumping chairman Paul Skinner 11 months ahead of plan. And yesterday's 18 per cent fall in iron ore production underlined the magnitude of the cutbacks ahead.

Rio's fourth-quarter production report is, of course, just a warm-up to the real event on February 12, when its half-year profits are released.


Oil Falls Below $34 After OPEC Reduces 2009 Demand Forecast – Bloomberg – Jan 15, 2009

Jan. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Crude oil fell below $34 a barrel after OPEC said that demand for its crude will decline 4.2 percent this year as the recession in the U.S., Europe and Japan curbs fuel use.


Natural Gas Falls After U.S. Supplies Drop Less Than Forecast – Bloomberg – Jan 15, 2009

Jan. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Natural gas fell to the lowest in more than two years in New York as government reports today on gas stockpiles, producer prices and manufacturing pointed to slower demand as the U.S. recession deepens.

Stockpiles declined 94 billion cubic feet last week, less than the 102 billion analysts expected, an Energy Department report showed. Prices paid to producers in the U.S. dropped for the fifth straight month and manufacturing in the New York and Philadelphia areas shrank. Slowing demand from factories and power plants has helped send gas down 15 percent this month.


Copper Prices Drop for Second Day in N.Y. as Stockpiles Rise – Bloomberg – Jan 15, 2009

Jan. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Copper futures fell for a second straight day as climbing inventories signaled global output of the metal is exceeding demand.

Stockpiles monitored by the London Metal Exchange climbed 1.4 percent to 387,325 metric tons today and have jumped 14 percent this month after surging 72 percent last year. Before today, copper prices plunged 65 percent from a record in May as slumping global growth slashed demand for the metal used in pipes and wires.


Soybeans Prices Jump on Adverse Weather in Argentina, Brazil – Bloomberg – Jan 15, 2009

Jan. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Soybeans prices jumped on signs that demand for U.S. supplies will increase as adverse weather damages crops in Argentina, the world’s biggest exporter of vegetable oil and animal feed made from the oilseed.


Australia Expects ‘Significant’ Drop in Coal, Iron Ore Prices – Bloomberg – Jan 15, 2009

Jan. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Export prices for coal and iron ore from Australia, the world’s biggest shipper of the raw materials, may drop significantly this year as slowing industrial growth curbs demand, the nation’s central bank said.

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Commodities in focus – mixed messages from China

Until this past October / November when markets came crashing down all over the world as the US credit crisis exploded into a full blown global economic crisis it seemed as if nothing could stem China's insatiable demand for commodities.

However, once economic crisis spread to wealthy nations a chain reaction started.

First, consumers who had been eating up cheap Chinese exports for years decreased their spending as credit dried up. Less demand for goods produced by China's manufacturing sector would mean less Chinese demand for commodities.

Second, a slowing global economy produced a situation where aggregate commodity demand shrank around the world. It mattered little if a country is rich or poor, a slowing global economy would mean less demand for energy and metals.

Third, as economic problems continued to spread it became less and less likely the economic dragon of China would be able to ride the storm out. If a global recession occurred, China would find it very difficult to rely solely on their domestic economy and international currency reserves to keep things growing as fast as they had been from 2001-2008.

Finally (and this is a over-simplification), combine all facts and you get a situation where the future of the global economy is unpredictable. Meaning, no one really knows when Chinese demand will pick up again, no one really knows when the global economy will recover and therefore investing in metals and energy seemed foolish if recession would hamper demand in the near future.

That being said, a few interesting stories passed through the presses this weekend. The first two indicate demand is returning to the commodity markets in China, the second two tell a different story.

Baoshan Steel, Angang Steel, Wuhan Iron & Steel and Maanshan Iron & Steel. Four major Chinese steelmaker stock ratings where raised by Credit Suisse, which said improving demand will help raise steel prices (click here for Bloomberg LP article).

China National Petroleum Corp., the country's biggest oil and gas producer, said it plans to increase oil and gas production by 5% annually to meet domestic demand (click here for Bloomberg LP article).

China's State Electricity Regulatory Commission said demand and output in China will continue to shrink this year because of slower economic growth. China is the world's second largest consumer of energy.

If people are using less electricity it means one of three things. First, it could be a bad sign for the economy. It could indicate the Chinese are becoming more efficient / environmentally friendly. Or third, it may mean the Chinese are trying to save a few Yuan from the higher price they have to pay for the energy.

The correct answer in this situation I feel is the first. A slowing economy simply means less demand for energy. I don't doubt the Chinese are indeed adapting their growth strategies to be more environmentally friendly, but I don't think it is the reason their demand for energy is shrinking (80% of China's energy comes from coal). Last, I don't think it's because of higher prices, commodities after all have once again become very cheap (click here for the Bloomberg LP article).

Moving onto aluminum. China's Shanxi Guanlu said on Friday it was shutting 40,000t of aluminum capacity owing to low prices and weak demand (click here for the full article from the Mining Journal).

I think the main idea to take away with you from all of this is that the market has no idea how to make up its mind and neither do the participants in the market. If and when the global economy does see a recovery, be sure you have some of your money invested in energy and metals, because demand will return and with a vengeance.

For a bit of perspective check out what Jimmy Rogers and Marc Faber, the guru's of commodity investing have to say.



Jim Rogers - Recession and Commodities in 2008




Marc Faber - Says He'd Favor Industrial Commodities Over Gold 2009 - P1




Marc Faber - Says He'd Favor Industrial Commodities Over Gold 2009 - P2

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Commodities in Focus -- Energy, food and metals grab world attention as prices continue to sour and supply problems emerge

Fitch analyst calls for new investment as oil prices soar - Regional

by Nathan Crooks

Business News Americas
http://www.bnamericas.com/news/privatization/Fitch_analyst_calls_for_new_investment_as_oil_prices_soar

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

High international oil prices should encourage oil companies that operate in Latin America to invest in new projects, Gianna Bern, senior director and oil and gas analyst for Fitch Ratings Latin America Corporate Finance, told BNamericas.

"In Latin America, governments have been the one of the biggest beneficiaries of high crude oil prices in terms of taxes and royalties," Bern said.

For example, Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia have increased their take of oil profits in recent years. Brazil and Colombia are mulling plans to increase the state's gains from oil production as well.

"Having said that, at US$135/b WTI, now is the time for the oil companies to invest and pursue those projects that they wouldn't ordinarily," she said in reference to West Texas Intermediate prices. "The economics become compelling."

The analyst, meanwhile, does not see an end to high oil prices in the short term.

"High crude oil prices are driven by a fundamental imbalance in the global market between crude oil supply and demand. Supplies are not able to keep up with rising demand, primarily from non-OECD countries," she said.

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) includes 30 member countries, including Mexico.

"There could be upward pressure on crude prices until there is more of a market balance which could take months, if not longer, for additional supplies to hit the market," Bern continued.

_____________________________________________________________


Grow more food or starve: FAO

Commodity Online
http://www.commodityonline.com/news/topstory/Grow-more-food-or-starve-FAO-9365-3.html

NEW DELHI: Want to beat the food crisis? Go for more investments in the agriculture sector and grow more food.

That is what United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has to advise the countries across the world.

If you don’t listen to FAO, your population will starve. That is the clear message came from Rome after a summit on food crisis there.

“There is an urgent need to help developing countries and countries in transition to expand agriculture and food production, and to increase investment in agriculture, agribusiness and rural development from both public and private sources,” the FAO summit declaration said.

Donors and International Financial Institutions are urged to provide balance of payments support and budget support to food-importing, low-income countries. Other measures should be considered as necessary to improve the financial situation of the countries in need, including reviewing debt servicing as necessary.

The final declaration also called on governments to assure United Nations agencies the resources to expand and enhance their food assistance and support safety net programmes to address hunger and malnutrition, when appropriate, through the use of local or regional purchases.

Speaking about the growing social threat from rising food prices at the opening of the summit, FAO director general Jacques Diouf said: “What is important today is to realise that the time for talking is long past. Now is the time for action.”

The declaration also called for development partners to participate in and contribute to international and regional initiatives on soaring food prices and assist countries to put in place the revised policies and measures to help farmers, particularly small-scale producers, to increase production and integrate with local, regional and international markets.

Also recommended by the declaration are initiatives that moderate unusual fluctuations in food grain prices. “We call on relevant institutions to assist countries in developing their food stock capacities and consider other measures to strengthen food security risk management for affected countries,” FAO said.

_________________________________________________


Is Nymex admitting to speculation in crude oil?
By Sreekumar Raghavan

MUMBAI: The debate is still raging on what is causing the crude to rise. It is going from one extreme to the other. Some blame it on high speculation, others on demand-supply imbalances and forecasters predicting it would rise to $200.

The actions of world’s largest commodity derivatives exchange, The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. during the past two days indicates the possibility that speculation is indeed beyond allowable limits.

In the case of oman crude oil, the margins were raised from $8300 to $9500 on June 9. For members it was raised from 9,130 to 10,450 and for customers from 11,205 to 12,825. On June 10 it was further revised to 11,500, 12,650 and 15,525 for clearing members, members and customers respectively.

It has announced margin changes for its crude oil and related futures contract even though no explanation has been provided for such actions by Nymex or market regulator Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Among the contracts attracting higher margins from now include: July to December 2008 crude oil, crude oil calendar swap, MiNYTM crude oil futures, Nymed MACI index futures, natural gas, oman crude among others.

July-December Contracts
Margins for the July to December 2008 crude oil, crude oil calendar swap, and crude oil financial futures contracts will increase to $8,750 from $7,750 for clearing members, to $9,625 from $8,525 for members, and to $11,813 from$10,463 for customers. Margins for all other months will increase to $8,500from $7,750 for clearing members, to $9,350 from $8,525 for members, and to$11,475 from $10,463 for customers.

The margins for the July through December NYMEX miNYTM crude oil futures contracts will increase to $4,375 from $3,875 for clearing members, to $4,813 from $4,263 for members, and to $5,906 from $5,231 for customers. Margins for all other months will increase to $4,250 from $3,875 for clearing members, to $4,675 from $4,263 for members, and to $5,738 from $5,231 for customers.The margins for the NYMEX MACI index futures contract will increase to $1,742 from $1,550 for clearing members, to $1,916 from $1,705 for members, and to$2,351 from $2,093 for customers.

Natural Gas
Margins for the first and second months of the natural gas, natural gas penultimate financial, and natural gas last day financial futures contracts will increase to $8,250 from $7,500 for clearing members, to $9,075 from $8,250 for members, and to $11,138 from $10,125 for customers.

The margins for the third and fourth months will increase to 9,000 from $8,000 for clearing members, to $9,900 from $8,800 for members, and to $12,150 from $10,800 for customers. Margins for the fifth to ninth months will increase to $9,250 from $8,500 for clearing members, to $10,175 from $9,350 formembers, and to $12,488 from $11,475 for customers.

The margins for the 10th to 21st months will increase to $6,000 from $5,500 for clearing members, to $6,600 from $6,050 for members, and to $8,100 from $7,425 for customers.

Margins for the 22nd to 33rd months will increase to $4,750 from $4,500 for clearing members, to $5,225 from $4,950 for members, and to $6,413 from $6,075 for customers. The margins for the 34th to 45th months will increase to $4,500 from $4,250 for clearing members, to $4,950 from $4,675 for members, and to $6,075 from $5,738 for customers. Margins for all other months will increase to $4,000 from $3,750 for clearing members, to $4,400 from $4,125 for members, and to $5,400 from $5,063 for customers.

The margins for the first and second months of the NYMEX miNY natural gas and Henry Hub swap and penultimate swap futures contracts will increase to $2,063 from $1,875 for clearing members, to $2,269 from $2,063 for members, and to$2,784 from $2,531 for customers. The margins for the third and fourth monthswill increase to $2,250 from $2,000 for clearing members, to $2,475 from$2,200 for members, and to $3,038 from $2,700 for customers.

Margins for the fifth to ninth months will increase to $2,313 from $2,125 for clearing members, to $2,544 from $2,338 for members, and to $3,122 from $2,869 for customers. The margins for the 10th to 21st months will increase to $1,500 from $1,375 for clearing members, to $1,650 from $1,513 for members, and to $2,025 from $1,856 for customers. Margins for the 22nd to 33rd months will increase to $1,188 from $1,125 for clearing members, to $1,306 from $1,238 for members, and to $1,603 from $1,519 for customers.

The margins for the 34th to 45th months will increase to $1,125 from $1,063 for clearing members, to $1,238 from $1,169 for members, and to $1,519 from $1,434 for customers.
Margins for all other months will increase to $1,000 from $938 for clearing members, to $1,100 from $1,031 for members, and to $1,350 from $1,266 for
customers.

The margins for the Henry Hub swing swap futures contracts will increase to $2,063 from $1,875 for clearing members, to $2,269 from $2,063 for members,and to $2,784 from $2,531 for customers.

Heating Oil
Margins for the first month of the heating oil, New York Harbor heating oil calendar swap, and heating oil financial futures contracts will increase to $10,000 from $9,000 for clearing members, to $11,000 from $9,900 for members, and to $13,500 from $12,150 for customers.

Margins for the second month will increase to $9,500 from $8,500 for clearing members, to $10,450 from $9,350 for members, and to $12,825 from $11,475 for customers. Margins for the third through ninth months will increase to $8,750 from $8,000 for clearing members, to $9,625 from $8,800 for members, and to $11,813 from $10,800 for customers. The margins for all other months will increase to $8,000 from $7,500 for clearing members, to $8,800 from $8,250 for members, and to $10,800 from $10,125 for customers.

.

Margins for the first month of NYMEX miNY heating oil futures contract will increase to $5,000 from $4,500 for clearing members, to $5,500 from $4,950 for members, and to $6,750 from $6,075 for customers.

The margins for the second month will increase to $4,750 from $4,250 for clearing members, to $5,225 from $4,675 for members, and to $6,413 from $5,738 for customers. Margins for the third through ninth months will increase to$4,375 from $4,000 for clearing members, to $4,813 from $4,400 for members,and to $5,906 from $5,400 for customers. Margins for all other months will increase $4,000 from $3,750 for clearing members, to $4,400 from $4,125 for members, and to $5,400 from $5,063 for customers.

Margins for the first month of the RBOB gasoline, RBOB financial, and RBOB calendar swap futures contracts will increase to $8,750 from $7,750 for clearing members, to $9,625 from $8,525 for members, and to $11,813 from $10,463 for customers. The margins for the second to fourth months will increase to $8,250 from $7,250 clearing members, to $9,075 from $7,975 for members, and to $11,138 from $9,788 for customers. Margins for the fifth to11th months will increase to $7,500 from $6,500 for clearing members, to $8,250 from $7,150 for members, and to $10,125 from $8,775 customers.Margins for all other months will increase to $7,250 from $6,250 for clearing members, to $7,975 from $6,875 for members, and to $9,788 from $8,438 for customers.

Margins for the first month of the NYMEX miNY RBOB gasoline futures contract will increase to $4,375 from $3,875 for clearing members, to $4,813 from $4,263 for members, and to $5,906 from 5,231 for customers. The margins for the second to fourth months will increase to $4,125 from $3,625 for clearing members, to $4,538 from $3,988 for members, and to $5,569 from $4,894 for customers. Margins for the fifth to 11th months will increase to $3,750 from $3,250 for clearing members, to $4,125 from $3,575 for members, and to $5,063 from $4,388 for customers. Margins for all other months will increase to$3,625 from $3,125 for clearing members, to $3,988 from $3,438 for members, and to $4,894 from $4,219 for customers.

If indeed, $25 of the present crude prices are on account of speculation, as suggested by some experts, will Nymex actions result in a fall in prices in near future? That itself can be cause for a speculation.

Meanwhile, a query related to increased margins from Commodity Online is awating reply from Nymex and CFTC

Saturday, June 7, 2008

The Emergence of a new economic order -- Influence of emerging markets and BRIC economies grow as Western Economies Slow

***Note I do not mean to violate any ownership rights on the below information -- this website is designed to pick and choose relevant information pertaining to commodity trade, trends and the growth of exchange or possible growth of new forms of exchange between Asia (predominantly China) and South America. I then also combine my own analysis and forecasts / theories to add personal substance.


This presentation was delivered by Eric Coffin, co-editor of the Hard Rock Analyst, at the New York Hard Assets Investment Conference, held 12-13 May 2008 at the New York Marriott Marquis on Times Square.

NEW YORK (Resource Investor Conferences) -- Morning, ladies and gentlemen. My name's Eric Coffin. My brother David and I publish a series of services newsletters, The Hard Rock Analyst publications. We're going to run through a couple of presentations here relatively quickly. I'm going to do mine, which is basically our rationale, our reasoning. It's not entirely dissimilar to some of the things you've heard from Lawrence [Roulston] about 10 minutes ago.

I mean, Lawrence and I are friends, and we agree on a number of things, including why the market's going to do what it's likely to do over the next little while, why it's done what it's done this decade. I'll go into that a bit. My brother will then follow with some talk about your grandfathers mining portfolio, and hell explain what that means and why we mean that. Its one of the other ways that this cycle is different from the last few, and how you can take advantage of the fact that its different from the last few.

This is where we start. This is basically the centerpiece, if you will, of whats gone on for the last 7 or 8 years, and what's likely to go on for the next 15 or 20. This is basically a short list that tells you where the growth is and where the growth isn't in the world economy. And we're talking about annual growth rates.

If you look at the West, and by West were really referring to the more developed countries, if you will. This years growth estimates and those are going to be revised a lot. I'm kind of hoping some of them will be revised in the right direction on the left-hand side, but the jurys definitely still out on that. But the U.S., you're looking at 1%, maybe, this year. Euro areas a little bit better, 1.7% to 2% is the last estimate I've got, but I suspect that's actually going to come down a little bit. Japan, I think, is going to come up a little bit. I think Canada will come up a little bit. But the bottom line here is all of those numbers are below 2% growth for this year.

This is obviously subtrend growth. If you look on the right-hand column, the picture�s decidedly different. China�s growth rate estimate this year is 9.8%. I think that one�s probably going to be revised up based on recent stuff I�ve seen. India�s just under 8%, southeast Asia�s 5% to 7%, Russia�s 7% - a lot of that�s oil, of course, but still, growth is growth. Brazil is 4.3%; that�s actually a very good number for Brazil. Brazil�s doing better now than they�ve actually done for a long time. And the Andes countries in South America are also doing significantly better in the last couple of years than they�ve done for a long time.

And the next slide here is - this is a graph that I pulled off of a Macquarie report, actually. It�s a very interesting graph because something I�ve heard again and again and again, especially coming out of commentators based in this city, is the whole decoupling thing is nonsense, it doesn�t work, there is no decoupling. Everybody else goes down the tubes with the States if we have a bad year. You know, we get the sniffles, everyone else gets pneumonia.

There�s two things you�ve got to keep in mind about that. Usually the people writing those commentaries, generally they�re people that focus on markets. And there isn�t much doubt that the epicenter of the world�s equity markets is in this city. And it does impact all other markets. But you�ve got to take a long-term perspective, and if you want to make money in markets, you�ve got to be looking at what�s going to happen going forward. And going forward, the important part of the story for us is if you take a look at these two graphs, basically what you�re looking at, the red line [hyphenated], the red graph, is U.S. growth. The green [dotted] is the rest of the world.

If you go back through the last 25 or 30 years, you�ll see that they pretty much hung together. There was a very strong correlation between the two of them. And in particular, there was a correlation, a positive correlation, in the sense that U.S. growth numbers tended to push world growth numbers. In other words, the old line - �When the U.S. gets the sniffles, the rest of us pneumonia� - was in fact true.

If you take a look at the graph for the last couple of years, it�s actually quite a bit different. The growth rate came out of 2000, got much higher in the rest of the world than in the U.S., and more to the point, if you look at the right side of that graph, although there was a bit of pull-down last year, by and large the rest of the world�s economy has not, in fact, slowed down as the U.S. did. And the projections right now are that it probably won�t. It will slow down some, but the slowdown�s going to be fairly minor in relation to what�s happening in the U.S. In other words, the rest of the world right now is the growth engine, not the U.S.

Something that we want to talk about when it comes to metals in general: the story�s slightly different from one metal to the next, but the overall story is much the same. This is something David and I have harped on for years and years, largely because we come out of the mining business. We came out of the mining side of it, not the market side of it, when we started doing these newsletters.

And one thing we understood was that the mining business went through 25 years that were very ugly. They were very, very nasty. It wasn�t a lot of fun. You saw short bull markets where companies would manage to make enough money to knock off some of the debt they�d accumulated in the 3 or 4 years before when prices were crappy. Guys were getting overloaded and building stuff that had low marginal return close to the top of these short cycles, just to get their head handed to them a year and a half later when things dipped again. And 25 years of that has an impact. And basically, what happened was the entire sector got gutted.

I mean, no one was going to university to take geology. No one was graduating as mining engineers. A lot of the assay labs went under. A lot of the companies that build equipment for mines went under. These are all specialized companies; they aren�t the kind of thing that gets off the ground in 6 months.

So what we�ve been saying for a long time is, it�s the supply, stupid. It�s not just about demand. Don�t get me wrong. The Asian demand story is real, and it�s a very important part of the picture. But part of the reason why we�ve been bullish and felt that we�d see historically high metal prices for a very long time is that the supply side of the equation has been stressed very, very heavily by 20 years of bad markets for most of these metals.

And even now, when times are really good, companies are pushing really hard and having a very difficult time getting stuff done, getting equipment delivered, getting exploration finished, getting lab results. I mean, you can pick anything in the sector. That has an enormous impact on it because it�s stretched out delivery times for all of these mines enormously.

And that�s really part of the reason why you�re seeing prices hold up better than a lot of outside-of-the-sector analysts expected them to because there�s an expectation outside of the sector that someone�s going to wave a magic wand and 20 large-scale mines are going to appear on the horizon next month.

Well, I�m here to tell you, it ain�t gonna happen. This is a very - I love this chart. This is a very interesting chart. There�s a copy of a previous talk I did on our website that has this. And I�ll take this talk when I get back to the office and turn it into a PDF and put it up on the website in the free article area, if you guys want to pull the slides up that way and save yourselves some writing.

This is a very interesting graph that was put together by Xstrata a couple of years ago. And this is basically what it tells you. If you look at the curve over on the left, they start each year - they took the projections of mines to come on stream, basically anticipated supply. And what they did is they pulled a bunch of mining analysts. They pulled together industry reports on �This is what we think is going to come on stream in the copper market,� and then next year and the year after and the year after.

The left-hand curve is 2001. Every year as you go over, you see the revised expectations each year for what they thought would come on stream. The important thing to note is if you look at the 2001 graph, you take it right up to about 2007, they�re showing 7 million tonnes of copper is what they thought would come on stream by 2007. What actually came on stream by 2007 was about 20% of that, about 1,400 tonnes. And that�s basically the picture going forward. The simple truth is this stuff just isn�t coming as fast as people thought it would. But demand is still rising very quickly.

This is probably the most important base metal chart, in my opinion, that you can see. Because it�s the big picture. It�s not going to tell you what a stock price is going to do next month, but this is the big picture in terms of this decade, next decade, and perhaps the one after that.

This is what�s called an intensity-of-use chart, and again, this one�s for copper. But they�re similar basically for all base metals. They�re pretty much the same. What this chart tells you is it�s a timeline. Each one of those colored lines is a country going through a timeline, its per-capita use of a given metal. In that case, copper.

Basically, the story is fairly simple, and that�s as people move up the line in terms of per-capita GEP, people get wealthier. They move into - the average person in country X moves to lower middle class or middle class status. People want stuff. They buy stuff. They buy cars, they buy houses with wiring and plumbing, they buy air conditioners, they buy refrigerators. All of that stuff takes metals. And basically, countries that were big manufactures at the same time - maybe one of the steepest curves there is the orange one for Korea, and that�s because Korea, as well as going through a real upward shift in their wealth, also went through an upward shift in their industrialization.

China and India are at the early stages of that. The red squares that you see just in the lower left-hand corner, that�s where China is right now. The expectation is 2015 and purchasing power parity, they expect China to get to about $15,000 per capita, purchasing parity income.

In order to get from A to B, based on this graph, and it�s not - the projection most of us are using is not particularly steep in terms of what that curve is going to do. That�s going to take about another 7 or 8 million tonnes of copper in the next 10 years to pull that off. I don�t know where that�s coming from, quite frankly. It�s going to be very, very difficult to do that. And the story�s the same for most metals.

I mean, the short and sweet here is that we expect above-trend prices, far-above-trend prices, for a very long time to come. So there�s definitely room here for companies to make money. There�s room for investors to make money on those companies. This isn�t a story we think is going away any time soon.

People are concerned about how much speculation there is in the metal market. And there is some, there�s not a lot of doubt about it. I mean, as people have been buying in the futures market. They�ve been using base metals, for instance, as an inflation hedge, and when you see the dollar pop up, you can see some of those trades get closed out.

If you go back the last week, in fact, you�ll see a couple of days where copper got whacked because the dollar had a good bounce. I think the dollar�s got potential to go a little bit lower, but we�re not expecting a huge drop from here. And where it�s at, it�s had a pretty big run down so far.

It�s going to be difficult for the Fed to cut rates any more than they�ve cut them already, quite frankly. I mean, they�re down to 2% now. Everybody can see the inflation coming. It�s not a big secret that the government numbers on inflation are a bit of a joke, quite frankly.

The actual inflation rate�s probably more like 5% or 6%, and it�s not likely to stay there for long. So I mean, what you�ve got right now is a negative interest rate scenario. The best analogy to that, I suppose, or the nearest analogy to that is the �70s. Negative interest rate scenarios - and that�s usually a rising inflation scenario.

That�s when you get a long period of negative rates. They tend to be very supportive of commodity prices in general. If you go back to the �70s, that was the last really good period for commodities where it went on for a long time. This period�s very similar. Plus, you�ve got a big demand surge out of two or three areas in the world.

So you�ve got the right backdrop for it. There will be periods where you�ll see funds unloading and you�ll see some short, sharp knocks. But basically, we think the price is going to rebuild itself in most of these cases because, as I laid out in the previous slides, the scenario�s there for long-term high prices.

You should be sensible about it. You want to be buying the dips. You don�t want to be buying the runs. You should be trading stuff. We tell our subscribers constantly to take profits. I think every page on our website on the subscriber�s side has actually got that on the bottom of the Web page. Because that�s the way you have to trade these things. You try to get them when the market doesn�t really want them, and when you get a run on things or somebody gets some good results, you take some money off the table.

Gold and silver, it�s a slightly different story, but I mean, the story�s not that dissimilar. I mean, obviously, there�s been a lot of moves on gold and silver and other precious metals because of the dollar falling. That, like I said, we�re not expecting a lot of drop from here, but although there isn�t a lot of room for interest rate moves to the down side in the U.S., there is some potential for Europe to raise rates. The ECB seems a lot more serious - they�re a lot more worried about inflation; they�re much more inflation hawks than the Fed is. So you may actually see the interest rate spread widen again, and that�ll hurt the dollar.

And the other thing that�s helped precious metals a lot in the last year or two is there�s been a real rise in ETFs because it�s simply a much easier, simpler, cheaper way to play metals. Most people just don�t want to bother buying physical stuff. They don�t want to start opening futures accounts. It�s a pretty painless way to do it.

And that�s been pulling a lot of metal, a lot of physical metal, off of the market. So basically, the base is a lot better than it was a few years ago, thanks to the ETFs. And keep in mind, if something nasty happens, the gold market and the silver market are very small markets. It really doesn�t take a lot of mainstream guys deciding it�s not a bad idea to own a bit of this stuff to really move the prices because these markets are really very small in relation to the rest of the market.

So basically, before Dave goes up to talk about a couple of his things, just the basic points here: This isn�t just a marketplace; this is a fundamental shift in economic power. It�s a fundamental shift in economic circumstances. It�s not a short-term trading thing. The short-term trade�s in it, but this is a 20- or 30-year cycle.

If you go back and look at all these other countries that went through those growth patterns and went through those demand growth patterns, that�s basically, historically, been a 20-year cycle. The average secular commodity bull market is about 24 years, and we�re about 8 years into this one.

The BRIC countries aren�t in a situation like we saw in the �70s or the �80s. Everybody thinks back to the banking crisis. They look back at the Latin American bond crisis, long-term capital, and they go, well, you look at how fragile those markets are. But again, it�s different this time. It has changed because most of those countries are actually in a very strong fiscal position. Most of these developing countries are in far better shape fiscally right now than the U.S. is, quite frankly. They�re the ones lending the U.S. money, not the ones borrowing it.

And resource producers - to echo something that I heard Lawrence say a few minutes ago - some of these guys have done well. We�ve had a bunch of names on our list that have done pretty well, even recently, discovery stores have done well. But there are a lot of producers, smaller producers and development companies, that aren�t getting price to anything like today�s prices.

I mean, the basis of this argument is we expect these prices to stay historically high for quite a long time, and I think the market will come around to this when people get a little less paranoid about the markets in general, when they go looking for sectors where - where�s the real money? Where are the sectors that have actually made a lot of money, not guys that have talked about maybe being able to make a lot of money, but guys that have actually done it? Where there�s profits, where I can have some comfort? The mining companies are that sector.

There�s a lot of companies in the mining sector, especially on the base metal side, that are incredibly profitable companies. They�re hugely cashed up. M&As are going to be a big thing in this market going forward for a long time because this is one of the few sectors in the entire market where guys playing the M&A game aren�t doing it with other people�s money. They don�t need to do it with other people�s money. They can go out and write checks and take other companies over themselves. So there�s a good market for that. We�ve had a number of companies on our list taken over in the last 2 years, and we think there�ll be a few more.

This is basically the publications that we do. I won�t bore you with the details. We do have a table downstairs; I�ll have some handout material there. I do have a thing there you can sign up on if you want to get samples of all of these things. Just give us an e-mail address and we�ll send all of them out to you.

Monday, June 2, 2008

Assessing China-Latin Ties

BY WILLIAM RATLIFF
Jamestown Foundation

http://www.latinbusinesschronicle.com/app/article.aspx?id=2452

William Ratliff is Adjunct Fellow at the Independent Institute, Research Fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution. Published by the Jamestown Foundation, China Brief, and reprinted with permission.

The explosive growth of China’s links to Latin America in recent years are but the latest developments in a history that reaches back to the Spanish colonial empire in the early-16th century. In some ways the perceived benefits and liabilities have not changed much over the centuries, though they are now on a far grander scale. A Spanish padre wrote in 1669 that “one cannot imagine any exquisite article for the equipment of a house which does not come from China.” At the same time, however, Spanish barbers in Mexico City petitioned the government to relocate Chinese barbers to the outskirts of the city because they worked too much and that constituted “unfair business practice." Only during the militant Maoist decade of the early-1960s to mid-1970s was China’s primary interest in Latin America, which was marginal, to overthrow existing governments.

REALISTIC ANALYSIS

Some in the United States and Latin America worry that this rapidly rising China poses or will pose a security threat to the United States and the region. Many also worry that the influx of Chinese, with their different culture and institutions, will reduce the prospects for Latin reforms that promote open markets, political democracy, and greater respect for human and civil rights, including the rule of law. Responses to these concerns depend on what the Chinese and Latin Americans want and get from their contacts and on a realistic analysis of Latin America and broader Sino-U.S. relations.

China’s interests in the region include the following: to buy raw materials and foodstuffs and to invest in the production and transportation of those products to China; to export manufactures and other products to the region; to promote stability there so that business contracts will be signed and honored by predictable governments; to support a subtle reduction of the “unipolar” position of the United States in the world; and to win political recognition from the cluster of Latin American countries that still recognize Taiwan as the “one China."

Latin American countries want to sell China raw materials and manufactures to guarantee their historically unstable economies a foundation of assured income; to receive foreign direct investment (FDI) in many fields, including infrastructure, without the “strings” that are attached to funds from Western sources; to reduce economic and political dependence on the United States; and perhaps to get some Chinese ideas on how to develop a national economy under effective elitist leadership.

CHILE-CHINA FTA

Drawing these interests together, Chinese Ambassador to Chile Liu Yuqin said in March that “Latin American countries and China … must make joint efforts to face the great challenge of the globalized world” (La Nacion [Santiago], March 2). Chilean President Michelle Bachelet, speaking for many Latin leaders, told President Hu Jintao during a visit to China in April that her country and people realize that the 21st century is in the hands of Asia, and especially China (China Daily, April 14). In 2006 Chile was the first country to sign a free trade agreement with China and in 2007 China replaced the United States as the major recipient of Chilean exports.

Relations between China and Latin America today have progressed beyond commerce, though trade and FDI are still primary objectives on both sides. According to statistics reported by Jiang Shixue, deputy director of the Institute of Latin American Studies (ILAS) at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), one of the most important think tanks advising the Chinese government on Latin American policies, Sino-Latin American trade grew from $1.9 million in 1950—just after the People’s Republic of China (PRC) was formed—to $343 million in 1965. Trade expanded to $475 million in 1975, $2.572 billion in 1985 and $6.114 billion in 1995 (Nueva Sociedad 203, May/June 2006). In November 2004, addressing the Brazilian Legislature, President Hu predicted that Sino-Latin American trade would rise to $100 billion by 2010, but in fact it rose to $102.6 billion in 2007 with a surge of 42 percent over 2006. There are important differences, however, in the spread of benefits in Sino-Latin American trade. Some 60 percent is with Brazil, Chile and Mexico, and the latter has a large deficit (Latin Business Chronicle, March 24). The countries exporting raw materials and foodstuffs, from oil and copper to soya, are the ones with positive balances, while others—including Mexico and some Caribbean Basin countries that rely more on manufactures—are being swamped by Chinese goods, limiting this lucrative relationship for some to a traditional focus on only a few export products.

CHINESE FDI

In April a high-level Chinese official reported that by the end of 2006 almost $22.7 billion of China’s FDI had gone to Latin America (China Daily, April 16). While it is true that billions in FDI has been promised to Brazil, Argentina, Ecuador, Peru, Venezuela, Mexico and other countries, for exploration for and transportation of raw materials and foods that China wants to buy, and other projects, information on actual FDI paid out is “somewhat murky,” as Robert Devlin, a regional adviser for the UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, puts it. A major portion of Chinese FDI in Latin America appears to be “round-tripping,” that is the funds are invested in tax havens in the Caribbean and then sent back to China to take advantage of preferences given to foreign firms.

The most debated issues with respect to China’s expansion into Latin America are (1) the security implications for the United States and the region, with sub-set questions on Cuba and Venezuela, and (2) China’s potential anti-democratic impact on Latin American governments and social systems.

NO IDEOLOGICAL COLOR

For starters, unlike the United States and Europe, China has no history of invading and colonizing other countries beyond its immediate border, what is today called Greater China. Also, China has publicly tried to avoid alarming the United States because of the critically important Sino-U.S. relations. The deputy director of the ILAS has written that “China understands well that Latin America is the backyard of the United States, so there is no need for China to challenge the American influence” there (Nueva Sociedad 2003, May/June 2006). After U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs Thomas Shannon talked with Chinese counterparts in Beijing in 2006, a top Latin Americanist at the CASS in Beijing, Xu Shicheng, said Chinese policy “has no ideological color nor is it directed against the interests of any other country” (Nueva Sociedad 203). As analyst Gonzalo Paz has noted, China’s activity in the region “hasn’t sparked strong U.S. reactions yet. Washington has either shown indifference or has considered such activity relatively inoffensive” (Asian Perspective, No. 4, 2006). Indeed, in March U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Thomas Christensen said, “We believe that China can make positive contributions to economic growth [in the region]… through increasing both direct investment and foreign assistance, and can serve as an exemplar of how pragmatic economic policy and trade openness can lead to increased literacy, managed urbanization and poverty reduction” (Testimony to U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, March 19).

U.S. policy itself has sometimes thrown the door open to China’s still restrained entry into military contacts in the region, prompting National War College Professor Cynthia Watson to remark, “If Washington is not interested in having a sustained, deep and satisfying, mutually respectful relationship with Latin America, the latter will turn elsewhere” (Testimony to U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, March 18). The security issue must of course be investigated constantly by intelligence agencies and other researchers, but conclusions must be drawn with balance and knowledge of broader issues of Chinese and Latin American history and politics.

CHINA AND CUBA

China has become deeply involved in Cuba as the island’s second most important trading partner after Venezuela, but also to some degree in intelligence gathering, at a level, however, that does not seem to greatly upset Washington. Without pushing, it also offers an adaptable model for carrying out productive post-Fidel economic reform while leaders retain their political power (China Brief, May 10, 2006). Yet in the words of Mao Xianglin, an ILAS Cuba specialist, “Socialist Cuba can catch up with and surpass others only by moving rapidly to break out of its intellectual straitjacket and intensifying its reforms” (Latin American Perspectives, November 2007). Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez has tried without success to get China to join an anti-American front. Though it is exploring oil and other matters, on balance China has more to lose than gain from Venezuela’s efforts to destabilize the region and promote economic ideas that will certainly only make countries poorer and more unstable (China Brief, March 15, 2006).

Does or will China undermine democracy in Latin America? This is a hard case to make because Latin Americans have had almost 200 years of independence to establish truly representative democratic governments and productive market economies if they wanted them, but they have only rarely and incompletely come close to doing so. Even though a slight majority of Latin Americans say democracy is the best system of government, a considerable majority say it does not work for them (Latinobarómetro, November 2007). Thus, much of Latin America today is again flirting with caudillo (strong-man) populism, exemplified by Chavez in Venezuela, but also by his acolytes in Bolivia, Ecuador and Nicaragua. When one recalls that Mexico and Peru also very nearly went “Chavista” in their last elections, and Argentina is semi-Chavista today, you see the strength of this Latin love affair with paternalism and Messiahs who promise to right the innumerable “wrongs” that have characterized Latin society since even before colonial times. China’s preference lies with governments that succeed, and thus their relations have developed most rapidly and smoothly with Chile, and secondarily with Brazil.

POLITICAL TIES

Word has seeped out of Washington that at the Shannon meetings in 2006 the Chinese promised not to meddle in Latin politics. Last year the author asked a top Chinese Communist Party (CCP) official working in international affairs if China wanted to get involved changing political systems in Latin America. He said “No. Why should we? We are perfectly happy with a system controlled by elites that keeps real popular involvement to a minimum, so long as they do not crash and continue to enforce the agreements made with us” (personal communication, April 10, 2007). If Latin leaders, however, ask the Chinese for ideas, Chinese leaders will certainly accommodate them. Indeed, the Chinese make it a point of developing party and legislative connections with leaders of all political inclinations in all countries, if possible. As Jiang Shixue has noted, Chinese and Latin political leaders “exchange views on strategies to improve governance, the management of party affairs, political modernization and socioeconomic development.”

The challenges for Latin American countries in the years ahead include investing the profits from China trade and FDI, and using the inspiration of the Chinese example, to lay a long-term foundation for national well-being, cultivating whatever traditional cultural and civic values do not prevent the development of broadly based economic progress. This will mean both rejecting the temptations of hopeless and disruptive Chavista populism and carrying out more than half-hearted reforms, both changes that would also benefit China and the United States. China needs to reduce logistical problems of long distances, perhaps in part by more joint Latin ventures for the United States and Latin markets, cultivate greater common cultural ground, not least by increasing cultural institutes, and the like. Assuming the continuation of something like China’s current development trajectory, and a lasting major U.S. role in the Western Hemisphere, the two large nations could work together to promote a more stable and prosperous region that would benefit themselves and Latin Americans as well.

Traditionally it has been easier to blame someone else for the region’s seemingly intractable and widespread poverty and inequalities and today many Latin Americans have made the Chinese their "favorite villain," as Korean analyst Won-ho Kim wrote in a Mexican paper in 2004 (Reforma, June 20, 2004). In the end, Latin America’s failure to develop more responsive political—and more productive economic—systems was not Britain’s or America’s fault in the past, and it is disingenuous at this stage to suggest that it will be China's fault in the future.